• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Departments
    • Bioengineering
    • Civil and Environmental Engineering
    • Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
    • Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
    • Materials Science and Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Nuclear Engineering
    • Aerospace program
    • Engineering Science program
  • News
    • Berkeley Engineer magazine
    • Social media
    • News videos
    • News digest (email)
    • Press kit
  • Events
    • Events calendar
    • Commencement
    • Homecoming
    • Cal Day
    • Space reservations
    • View from the Top
    • Kuh Lecture Series
    • Minner Lecture
  • College directory
  • For staff & faculty
Berkeley Engineering

Educating leaders. Creating knowledge. Serving society.

  • About
    • Facts & figures
    • Rankings
    • Mission & values
    • Equity & inclusion
    • Voices of Berkeley Engineering
    • Leadership team
    • Milestones
    • Buildings & facilities
    • Maps
  • Admissions
    • Undergraduate admissions
    • Graduate admissions
    • New students
    • Visit
    • Maps
    • Admissions events
    • K-12 outreach
  • Academics
    • Undergraduate programs
    • Majors & minors
    • Undergraduate Guide
    • Graduate programs
    • Graduate Guide
    • Innovation & entrepreneurship
    • Kresge Engineering Library
    • International programs
    • Executive education
  • Students
    • New students
    • Advising & counseling
    • ESS programs
    • CAEE academic support
    • Student life
    • Wellness & inclusion
    • Undergraduate Guide
    • > Degree requirements
    • > Policies & procedures
    • Forms & petitions
    • Resources
  • Research & faculty
    • Centers & institutes
    • Undergrad research
    • Faculty
    • Sustainability and resiliency
  • Connect
    • Alumni
    • Industry
    • Give
    • Stay in touch
Home > News > To a fault
Gregory McLaskey

To a fault

Berkeley Engineer Spring 2013
May 1, 2013
This article appeared in Berkeley Engineer magazine, Spring 2013
  • In this issue

    Features

    Critical making comes to campus

    Experiential ed

    Greening the factory floor

    Dean’s Word

    Upfront

    • Engineering benchmarks for cap-and-trade
    • Welcoming a new chancellor
    • RadMAP rollout
    • Mind the gap
    • EECS offers online master’s program
    • Introducing the Dreambox
    • Q+A: Oxford-bound
    • Comments

    Breakthroughs

    • To a fault
    • A hot spot
    • Mind readers
    • Everlasting clock
    • Streamlined

    Alumni notes

    • Chair man
    • Farewell

    Download this issue

  • Past issues

The typical lifecycle of an earthquake fault looks like this: rupture, rest, repeat. Now, Berkeley researchers have found that the “rest” component of this process is linked to the destructive potential of earthquakes on a given fault. A new study from the lab of civil and environmental engineering professor Steven Glaser shows that determining how long a fault has healed between seismic events can allow scientists to accurately predict the type of shaking that will occur when it ruptures again. Study lead author Gregory McLaskey (Ph.D.’11 CEE) built a tabletop model of a quake fault equipped with sensors, which enabled the research team to test different earthquake scenarios and learn more about high-frequency seismic waves, which produce rapid jolts and cause the most damage. The study, published in Nature, could help engineers better evaluate buildings, bridges and roads for seismic vulnerabilities, and ultimately develop ways to mitigate the risk of damage.

Topics: Civil engineering, Faculty, Research
  • Contact
  • Give
  • Privacy
  • UC Berkeley
  • Accessibility
  • Nondiscrimination
  • instagram
  • X logo
  • linkedin
  • facebook
  • youtube
© 2025 UC Regents